tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891359700208493876.post3137283445351242488..comments2023-07-25T06:09:54.359-07:00Comments on Video Networker: Inside the Unified Communications Interoperability Forum (UCIF)Stefan Karapetkovhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08183450844021421072noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891359700208493876.post-30453219120889998962010-11-24T09:42:14.786-08:002010-11-24T09:42:14.786-08:00Looks like UCIF will be more useful in test/certif...Looks like UCIF will be more useful in test/certification/approval processes when interoperability solutions are created rather than helping create them. Currently what value does this approval/certification have?Sanjayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06347809845877020527noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891359700208493876.post-42364787447983123942010-10-16T03:50:24.162-07:002010-10-16T03:50:24.162-07:00Stefan and the UCIF community, my question is: So ...Stefan and the UCIF community, my question is: So why didn't UCIF start with a "living communications WG or at least a human communications WG"? I get the technical need to standardize but are you truly trying to standardize or jocking for technical/market dominance position?<br /><br />It just seems to me that you need to start with a "common unity" (aka "comm on unity" (community)) before you can even begin to work together towards the best solutions. And the best solutions are only best in their simplest form.twitter:@DerekAbramsCVEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17158685582974577294noreply@blogger.com